Given that READ_ONCE() now implies smp_read_barrier_depends(),
there is no need for the open-coded smp_read_barrier_depends() in
mn10300_serial_receive_interrupt() and mn10300_serial_poll_get_char().
This commit therefore removes them, but replaces them with comments
calling out that carrying dependencies through non-pointers is quite
dangerous.  Compilers simply know too much about integers.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-am33-l...@redhat.com>
---
 arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-serial.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-serial.c 
b/arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-serial.c
index d7ef1232a82a..4994b570dfd9 100644
--- a/arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-serial.c
+++ b/arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-serial.c
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static void mn10300_serial_receive_interrupt(struct 
mn10300_serial_port *port)
                return;
        }
 
-       smp_read_barrier_depends();
+       /* READ_ONCE() enforces dependency, but dangerous through integer!!! */
        ch = port->rx_buffer[ix++];
        st = port->rx_buffer[ix++];
        smp_mb();
@@ -1728,7 +1728,10 @@ static int mn10300_serial_poll_get_char(struct uart_port 
*_port)
                        if (CIRC_CNT(port->rx_inp, ix, MNSC_BUFFER_SIZE) == 0)
                                return NO_POLL_CHAR;
 
-                       smp_read_barrier_depends();
+                       /*
+                        * READ_ONCE() enforces dependency, but dangerous
+                        * through integer!!!
+                        */
                        ch = port->rx_buffer[ix++];
                        st = port->rx_buffer[ix++];
                        smp_mb();
-- 
2.5.2

Reply via email to