4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
commit 363fa4e078cbdc97a172c19d19dc04b41b52ebc8 upstream.
This patch fixes the renaming bug on encrypted filenames, which was pointed by
(ext4: don't allow encrypted operations without keys)
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/f2fs/namei.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
@@ -663,6 +663,12 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old
bool is_old_inline = f2fs_has_inline_dentry(old_dir);
int err = -ENOENT;
+ if ((f2fs_encrypted_inode(old_dir) &&
+ !fscrypt_has_encryption_key(old_dir)) ||
+ (f2fs_encrypted_inode(new_dir) &&
+ !fscrypt_has_encryption_key(new_dir)))
+ return -ENOKEY;
+
if ((old_dir != new_dir) && f2fs_encrypted_inode(new_dir) &&
!fscrypt_has_permitted_context(new_dir, old_inode)) {
err = -EPERM;
@@ -843,6 +849,12 @@ static int f2fs_cross_rename(struct inod
int old_nlink = 0, new_nlink = 0;
int err = -ENOENT;
+ if ((f2fs_encrypted_inode(old_dir) &&
+ !fscrypt_has_encryption_key(old_dir)) ||
+ (f2fs_encrypted_inode(new_dir) &&
+ !fscrypt_has_encryption_key(new_dir)))
+ return -ENOKEY;
+
if ((f2fs_encrypted_inode(old_dir) || f2fs_encrypted_inode(new_dir)) &&
(old_dir != new_dir) &&
(!fscrypt_has_permitted_context(new_dir, old_inode) ||
