Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0"

[H. Peter Anvin]

Followup to:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:    Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> 
> That isnt what Andries is arguing about. Read harder. Its semantic differences
> rather than code differences.
> 
>       static int a=0;
> 
> says 'I thought about this. I want it to start at zero. I've written it this
> way to remind of the fact'
> 
> Sure it generates the same code
> 

The problem is that it doesn't.  One could argue this is a gcc bug or
rather missed optimization.

One can, of course, also write:

    static int a /* = 0 */;

... to make it clear to human programmers without making gcc make bad
code.

        -hpa
-- 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/