On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 05:33:47PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > How come you don't enable KASAN? Any other options you all should be > enabling to get better test coverage that you are not?
KASAN probably wants to be built as a separate config and have some subset of the tests run on it, there's a substantial overhead from it so it'll cause issues when they get round to benchmarking and I'd not be surprised if it ended up masking some timing issues even in the more simple functional tests that are being run now.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
