On 2017-10-10 14:43:13 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > OK, internally I could get rid of raw_ at the expense of some code bloat, > > but in the call_srcu() case, the caller might well hold a raw_ lock. > > Except that none currently do, so maybe downgrading from raw_ locks is > a reasonable course of action. Does the following patch help?
so you revert the raw_ access, this should work. I will apply it tomorrow and let you know. > Thanx, Paul Sebastian
