On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:38:17AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > > As long as we have the same level of protection, simpler code is of > course preferable. That said, I haven't followed the discussion > closely and don't want to apply it without Peter's ack. Peter?
I'm really tied up atm; and feel we should be addressing the false positives generated by the current code before we start doing new stuff on top.
