On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 06:02:35PM -0500, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> I'd rather have Anaconda changed rather than special casing standard
> utils to account for distro handling.
Great. Then tell RedHat to rewrite it without the need for these switches.
They will say NO. It's a trivial change, and would save me a lot of hours
rewriting scripts. I did it once, but if RedHat has standardized on this
set of switches, why not add them as alias commands? It's a trivial
patch.
Jeff
>
> "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote:
> >
> > Anaconda will barf and require over 850+ changes to the scripts without
> > it. If you look at the patch, you will note that it's a silent switch
> > that's only there to avoid a noisy error message from depmod. It
> > actually does nothing other than set a flag that also does nothing.
> > -m simply maps to -F.
> >
>
> --
>
> =====================================================================
> Mohammad A. Haque http://www.haque.net/
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Project Lead
> Don't drink and derive." --Unknown http://wm.themes.org/
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> =====================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
