In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
In this particular case, notice that I replaced the "no break here,
fall through" comments with "fall through" comments, which is what
GCC is expecting to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
---
drivers/auxdisplay/panel.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/auxdisplay/panel.c b/drivers/auxdisplay/panel.c
index 6911acd..8b80a97 100644
--- a/drivers/auxdisplay/panel.c
+++ b/drivers/auxdisplay/panel.c
@@ -1372,7 +1372,7 @@ static void panel_process_inputs(void)
break;
input->rise_timer = 0;
input->state = INPUT_ST_RISING;
- /* no break here, fall through */
+ /* fall through */
case INPUT_ST_RISING:
if ((phys_curr & input->mask) != input->value) {
input->state = INPUT_ST_LOW;
@@ -1385,11 +1385,11 @@ static void panel_process_inputs(void)
}
input->high_timer = 0;
input->state = INPUT_ST_HIGH;
- /* no break here, fall through */
+ /* fall through */
case INPUT_ST_HIGH:
if (input_state_high(input))
break;
- /* no break here, fall through */
+ /* fall through */
case INPUT_ST_FALLING:
input_state_falling(input);
}
--
2.7.4
