What's the reason for splitting this up? Things would be a quite a bit
simpler if all the code was directly in atakeyb.c.
> +/*
> + * linux/atari/atakeyb.c
This is a good reason why filename comments are a really bad idea :)
> +/* state: 0: off; >0: in progress; >1: 0xf1 received */
> +static volatile int ikbd_self_test;
> +/* timestamp when last received a char */
> +static volatile unsigned long self_test_last_rcv;
Please don't use volatile variable in kernel code. While linux/m68k doesn't
support smp or preemptible kernels we should at least put in proper
synchronization
at the API level.
> +/* bitmap of keys reported as broken */
> +static unsigned long broken_keys[128/(sizeof(unsigned long)*8)] = { 0, };
DECLARE_BITMAP()
> +typedef enum kb_state_t {
> + KEYBOARD, AMOUSE, RMOUSE, JOYSTICK, CLOCK, RESYNC
> +} KB_STATE_T;
> +
> +#define IS_SYNC_CODE(sc) ((sc) >= 0x04 && (sc) <= 0xfb)
> +
> +typedef struct keyboard_state {
> + unsigned char buf[6];
> + int len;
> + KB_STATE_T state;
> +} KEYBOARD_STATE;
Please kill the typedefs and shouting names.
> +#ifdef __MODULE__
> +MODULE_PARM(mouse_threshold, "2i");
> +#endif
__MODULE__ is never true and even if it was a MODULE_PARM wouldn't compile.
use an unconditional module_param instead.
> --- linux-m68k-2.6.21.orig/include/linux/input.h
> +++ linux-m68k-2.6.21/include/linux/input.h
> @@ -676,6 +676,7 @@ struct input_absinfo {
> #define BUS_I2C 0x18
> #define BUS_HOST 0x19
> #define BUS_GSC 0x1A
> +#define BUS_ATARI 0x1B
Is this really a separate bus? Should't we have a BUS_ONBOARD or so instead?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
