On Tue, 1 May 2007 22:53:52 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:28:18PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > > > +#define __attribute_unused__ __attribute__((unused)) > > > > Suggest __unused which is shorter and looks compiler-neutral. > > > > So you would also suggest renaming __attribute_used__ and all 48 of its > uses to __used? Or __needed or __unneeded. None of them mean much to me and I'd be forever going back to the definition to work out what was intended. We're still in search of a name, IMO. But once we have it, yeah, we should update all present users. We can do that over time: retain the old and new definitions for a while. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
