Hi,

> +     {
> +             .compatible = "atmel,spd",
> +             .data = (void *)AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8,
> +                             AT24_FLAG_READONLY | AT24_FLAG_IRUGO)
> +     },

checkpatch reported this one as un-documented. And come to think of it,
since this is solely for EEPROMs on RAM modules, I think we can drop a
DT binding for it. Could you agree? I can do it locally, no need to
resend. I'll do HW testing later, but wanted to check on your opinion
already.

Thanks,

   Wolfram

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to