On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:50:12 -0700 Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 11:11 PM, Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> wrote: > > On 04/11/2017 09:06 AM, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > >> > >> Save a bit of cleanup code by leveraging newly added > >> devm_register_reboot_notifier(). > >> > >> Cc: cphe...@gmail.com > >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <w...@iguana.be> > >> Cc: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> > >> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> > >> Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> > >> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smir...@gmail.com> > > > > > > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> > > > > Andrew, > > This patch can't go in via watchdog tree because it depends on > devm_register_reboot_notifier() which is still present only in > linux-next, any change you can pull this into linux-next as well? That's because I've been sitting on kernel-reboot-add-devm_register_reboot_notifier.patch since March because it has no users. This patch adds a user. Have you identified other sites which can/should use devm_register_reboot_notifier()? I guess quite a lot, so it's a matter of alerting developers to the new interface. I wonder how. A checkpatch rule would do it, but that's new ground for checkpatch.
