On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 09:10:04AM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> At the moment vgic_its_process_commands() does not
> check the CBASER is valid before processing any command.
> Let's fix that.
>
> Also rename cbaser local variable into cbaser_pa to avoid
> any confusion with the full register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> index 3b539d4..e18f1e4 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> @@ -1301,17 +1301,20 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_its_cbaser(struct kvm
> *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
> /* Must be called with the cmd_lock held. */
> static void vgic_its_process_commands(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its)
> {
> - gpa_t cbaser;
> + gpa_t cbaser_pa;
> u64 cmd_buf[4];
>
> - /* Commands are only processed when the ITS is enabled. */
> - if (!its->enabled)
> + /*
> + * Commands are only processed when the ITS is enabled and
> + * CBASER is valid
> + */
> + if (!its->enabled || (!(its->cbaser & GITS_CBASER_VALID)))
Is it valid to clear the CBASER valid bit after having enabled the ITS?
If not, I think you should check changes to CBASER and then this
shouldn't be necessary.
> return;
>
> - cbaser = CBASER_ADDRESS(its->cbaser);
> + cbaser_pa = CBASER_ADDRESS(its->cbaser);
>
> while (its->cwriter != its->creadr) {
> - int ret = kvm_read_guest(kvm, cbaser + its->creadr,
> + int ret = kvm_read_guest(kvm, cbaser_pa + its->creadr,
> cmd_buf, ITS_CMD_SIZE);
> /*
> * If kvm_read_guest() fails, this could be due to the guest
> --
> 2.5.5
>
Otherwise, this looks fine.
Thanks,
-Christoffer
