Kees Cook <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> wrote: >> Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:47:10 -0700 >>> Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to >>>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer() >>>> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. >>>> >>>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: [email protected] >>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> >>> >>> Looks fine to me. Is this intended to be merged via the powerpc tree >>> in the next merge window? >> >> It relies on the new timer_setup(), which is in one of tglx's trees (I >> think). So I expect it to go via that tree. > > It's in -rc3, but the timer tree can carry it if you want. Which do > you prefer?
Oh sorry, I assumed it was in only in linux-next. I'll take this. Thanks. cheers
