On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:32:32PM -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> Currently, tpm_msleep() uses delay_msec as the minimum value in
> usleep_range. However, that is the maximum time we want to wait.
> The function is modified to use the delay_msec as the maximum
> value, not the minimum value.
>
> After this change, performance on a TPM 1.2 with an 8 byte
> burstcount for 1000 extends improved from ~9sec to ~8sec.
>
> Fixes: 3b9af007869("tpm: replace msleep() with usleep_range() in TPM 1.2/
> 2.0 generic drivers")
>
> Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <na...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> index 4fc83ac7abeb..644de70de2cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> @@ -528,8 +528,8 @@ int tpm_pm_resume(struct device *dev);
>
> static inline void tpm_msleep(unsigned int delay_msec)
> {
> - usleep_range(delay_msec * 1000,
> - (delay_msec * 1000) + TPM_TIMEOUT_RANGE_US);
> + usleep_range((delay_msec * 1000) - TPM_TIMEOUT_RANGE_US,
> + delay_msec * 1000);
> };
>
> struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_find_get(int chip_num);
> --
> 2.13.3
>
Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com>
/Jarkko
