On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 4:57 AM, Andrew Jeffery <and...@aj.id.au> wrote:
> Literally. > > I expect "lose" was meant here, rather than "loose", though you could feasibly > use a somewhat uncommon definition of "loose" to mean what would be meant by > "lose": "Loose the hounds" for instance, as in "Release the hounds". > Substituting in "value" for "hounds" gives "release the value", and makes some > sense, but futher substituting back to loose gives "loose the value" which > overall just seems a bit anachronistic. > > Instead, use modern, pragmatic English and save a character. > > Cc: Russell Currey <rus...@russell.cc> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <and...@aj.id.au> Patch applied as obviously correct. Yours, Linus Walleij
