Hello, On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 07:13:33PM +0300, Tal Shorer wrote: > > Do we have a consistent behavior around this? Are there different > > examples where isolcpus interact with other dynamically configurable > > parameters? > > > sched_setaffinity comes to mind, which obviously bypasses isolcpus. > Running git grep, other uses of cpu_isolated_map are just its > initialization and its use and the initialization of > non_isolated_cpus.
Can you add a comment explaining that it's intentional that we only follow isolcpus during boot and allow later overrides? Thanks. -- tejun
