On (10/22/17 22:30), Baoquan He wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhat...@gmail.com>
-ss
> ---
> kernel/printk/printk_safe.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c b/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c
> index 3cdaeaef9ce1..89558b85f45c 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static void queue_flush_work(struct printk_safe_seq_buf *s)
> * have dedicated buffers, because otherwise printk-safe preempted by
> * NMI-printk would have overwritten the NMI messages.
> *
> - * The messages are fushed from irq work (or from panic()), possibly,
> + * The messages are flushed from irq work (or from panic()), possibly,
> * from other CPU, concurrently with printk_safe_log_store(). Should this
> * happen, printk_safe_log_store() will notice the buffer->len mismatch
> * and repeat the write.
> --
> 2.5.5
>
