From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
The NCPFS code has some stale comments regarding ACCESS_ONCE() uses
which were removed a long time ago.
Let's remove the stale comments.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Petr Vandrovec <p...@vandrovec.name>
---
fs/ncpfs/dir.c | 9 ---------
1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ncpfs/dir.c b/fs/ncpfs/dir.c
index 088f52484d6e..72cfaa253a8f 100644
--- a/fs/ncpfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ncpfs/dir.c
@@ -119,10 +119,6 @@ static inline int ncp_case_sensitive(const struct inode *i)
/*
* Note: leave the hash unchanged if the directory
* is case-sensitive.
- *
- * Accessing the parent inode can be racy under RCU pathwalking.
- * Use ACCESS_ONCE() to make sure we use _one_ particular inode,
- * the callers will handle races.
*/
static int
ncp_hash_dentry(const struct dentry *dentry, struct qstr *this)
@@ -147,11 +143,6 @@ ncp_hash_dentry(const struct dentry *dentry, struct qstr
*this)
return 0;
}
-/*
- * Accessing the parent inode can be racy under RCU pathwalking.
- * Use ACCESS_ONCE() to make sure we use _one_ particular inode,
- * the callers will handle races.
- */
static int
ncp_compare_dentry(const struct dentry *dentry,
unsigned int len, const char *str, const struct qstr *name)
--
2.5.2
