On 20 October 2017 at 23:11, Bjorn Helgaas <helg...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:11:08AM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> > IATU unroll feature can be enabled in EP mode as well, so we need to
> > have this check in pcie-designware-ep.c, so instead of making this
> > function as static in pcie-desigware-host.c, let's move this in
> > pcie-designware.c so that both pcie-designware-host.c and
> > pcie-designware-ep.c can use it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.du...@samsung.com>
>
> This is fine with me but I'm looking for an ack from Jingoo and/or Joao.
>
Jingoo / Joao any comments on this?
>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 4 ++++
> > drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 11 -----------
> > drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > index d53d5f1..64803a9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > @@ -314,6 +314,10 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> > if (ep->ops->ep_init)
> > ep->ops->ep_init(ep);
> >
> > + pci->iatu_unroll_enabled = dw_pcie_iatu_unroll_enabled(pci);
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "iATU unroll: %s\n",
> > + pci->iatu_unroll_enabled ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> > +
> > epc = devm_pci_epc_create(dev, &epc_ops);
> > if (IS_ERR(epc)) {
> > dev_err(dev, "failed to create epc device\n");
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > index 81e2157..d3f579e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > @@ -574,17 +574,6 @@ static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
> > .write = dw_pcie_wr_conf,
> > };
> >
> > -static u8 dw_pcie_iatu_unroll_enabled(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> > -{
> > - u32 val;
> > -
> > - val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
> > - if (val == 0xffffffff)
> > - return 1;
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp)
> > {
> > u32 val;
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > index 88abddd..f15da90 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > @@ -92,6 +92,17 @@ void __dw_pcie_write_dbi(struct dw_pcie *pci, void
> > __iomem *base, u32 reg,
> > dev_err(pci->dev, "write DBI address failed\n");
> > }
> >
> > +u8 dw_pcie_iatu_unroll_enabled(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>
> I know this is just moved verbatim, but it's more conventional to simply
> return an int (or possibly bool) for a predicate like this. There's really
> no point in going out of your way to specify "u8" for the return type.
>
Ok, it can be done, will wait for comments from Jingoo and or Joao and
then update.
Thanks,
Pankaj
> > +{
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
> > + if (val == 0xffffffff)
> > + return 1;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static u32 dw_pcie_readl_ob_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 index, u32 reg)
> > {
> > u32 offset = PCIE_GET_ATU_OUTB_UNR_REG_OFFSET(index);
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > index e5d9d77..8d6829c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int
> > index, int bar,
> > void dw_pcie_disable_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index,
> > enum dw_pcie_region_type type);
> > void dw_pcie_setup(struct dw_pcie *pci);
> > +u8 dw_pcie_iatu_unroll_enabled(struct dw_pcie *pci);
> >
> > static inline void dw_pcie_writel_dbi(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 reg, u32
> > val)
> > {
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
