Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] But I can still see these awful latency blips in the presence of > > negatively niced chew.c at -10 and two chew.c's at nice 0. [...] > > of course: you asked for the two chew's to be treated like that and CFS > delivered it! :-) > > nice -10 means the two chew's will get ~90+% of the CPU time, and all > other nice 0 tasks will get <10% of CPU time.
Yes, but the latencies fluctuate wildly from 5ms to sched_granularity_ns*1000. Isn't it possible to smooth this? Thanks! -- Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/