* Craig Bergstrom <[email protected]> wrote:
> Reverting seems like the right approach at the moment. My apologies
> for the breakage so late the in the cycle.
Note that there's no need for you to apologize and you carry exactly zero
amount
of blame for the late-cycle breakage: it was my decision to send it to Linus so
quickly, you never asked for it to be sent upstream on such a short notice.
( Classic "patch makes sense, looks good, other arches ar doing this too, and I
tested it myself too on multiple systems, so it must be obviously fine for
everyone" moment. )
Your change still makes sense from a robustness POV, so please send it again
with
the suggested fixes - and I'll be more careful with the upstream merge this
time.
Thanks,
Ingo
