On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Jan Kara <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri 27-10-17 13:53:20, Jan Kara wrote:
>> On Wed 25-10-17 16:31:39, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]> 
>> > wrote:
>> > > We discovered some problems in the latest fsnotify/fanotify codebase with
>> > > the help of a stress test (Xiong Zhou is working on upstreaming it to
>> > > fstests).
>> > >
>> > > This series attempts to fix these.  With the patch applied the stress 
>> > > test
>> > > passes.
>> > >
>> > > Please review/test.
>> > >
>> > > Changes in v2 (only cosmetic fixes, no functional change):
>> > >  - split first patch into 3 parts to make it more readable
>> > >  - checkpatch fixes
>> > >  - added cleanup patch for fanotify
>> >
>> > Pushed v3 (again with just cosmetics) to:
>> >
>> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git 
>> > fsnotify-fixes-v3
>>
>> Sorry, I was at OSS Europe this week so I didn't find time to have a close
>> look. I'll try to check it early next week and pick it up to my tree.
>> Also thanks Amir for reviewing Miklos' patches!
>
> So I went through all patches and commented on those where I had some
> questions / suggestions. Once those are addressed, I can pick this up to my
> tree.

Pushed v5 to:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git
fsnotify-fixes-v5

Changes from v4:
- address comments for fanotify cleanup patch

Thanks,
Miklos

Reply via email to