Hi Boris, On 30 October 2017 at 19:04, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Boris, > > On 30 October 2017 at 18:33, Boris Brezillon > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Yep, it makes sense to have that one applied too, but this is pretty >> much the same problem: it will conflict with the ->exec_op() rework. > > True. I did realise that. > >> Can you please send it to the ML so I can track it in patchwork and > > Sure.
I could not get that patch compiled yet. I will revisit it next week and send the patch. Regards, PrasannaKumar
