Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW, I should have marked this as an RFC comment, rather than an actual > submission. We don't need it for .22. > >> NAK. >> >> Skipping the segment register load is likely fine. >> Supporting V!=P at startup_32 is not. >> > > Why? > >> Assuming that we have a stack at startup_32 is not. >> >> If you want to figure out where the kernel is loaded you can do >> (from arch/i386/boot/head.S) >> > > Yes, that's more or less the same code, aside from using 0x40(%esi) as a > stack. Would that be OK here?
Using 0x40 as a stack would be ok. There are issues with CONFIG_RELOCATABLE and V!=P that I'm not comfortable with yet, because we can't tell the difference. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
