On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 02:35:50PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 18:27:02 +0200 > Marc CAPDEVILLE <m.capdevi...@no-log.org> wrote: > > > On asus T100, Capella cm3218 chip is implemented as ambiant light > > sensor. This chip expose an smbus ARA protocol device on standard > > address 0x0c. The chip is not functional before all alerts are > > acknowledged. > > On asus T100, this device is enumerated on ACPI bus and the > > description give tow I2C connection. The first is the connection to > > the ARA device and the second gives the real address of the device. > > > > So, on device probe,If the i2c address is the ARA address and the > > device is enumerated via acpi, we lookup for the real address in > > the ACPI resource list and change it in the client structure. > > if an interrupt resource is given, and only for cm3218 chip, > > we declare an smbus_alert device. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marc CAPDEVILLE <m.capdevi...@no-log.org> > > Wolfram - this needs input from you on how to neatly handle > an ACPI registered ARA.
ACPI is really not my field. Try asking the I2C ACPI maintainers or Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com> who did work on SMBus interrupts recently.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
