On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidef...@de.ibm.com> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 03:27:37 -0700 > Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer() >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. >> >> Cc: Harald Freudenberger <fre...@de.ibm.com> >> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidef...@de.ibm.com> >> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com> >> Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> >> --- >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c | 10 +++++----- >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h | 2 +- >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c | 2 +- >> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > Parked for the second part of the s390 updates for the next merge window. > Thanks.
Thanks for getting these staged. I just wanted to check with you, since I don't see these in -next anywhere yet: s390: qdio: Convert timers to use timer_setup() s390/sclp: Convert timers to use timer_setup() s390/cio: Convert timers to use timer_setup() s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup() s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup() Are all of these expected to land for -rc1? (Would it help to carry them in the timer tree?) I've got tree-wide changes ready to go once all these conversions have landed. Thanks! -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
