On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com> wrote:
> We used to link against libgcc way back when, but that dependency was
> removed in commit d67703a8a69e ("arm64: kill off the libgcc dependency")
> and I'm really not keen to add it back. I also think that there might
> be licensing concerns if you link against it and make use of GCC plugins,
> but IANAL.Considering many other architectures link to it, that seems strange to me... > > Shouldn't we just provide our own implementations of __ashlti3 and > __ashrti3 instead? I just coded up an implementation. I'm testing it now and I'll have v3 for you shortly. Jason
