Hi Gustavo,

> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
> 
> Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
> "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
> ---
>  drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c b/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c
> index c0d07ee..c882252 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c
> @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static long pcipcwd_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int 
> cmd,
>                       return -EINVAL;
>  
>               pcipcwd_keepalive();
> -             /* Fall */
> +             /* fall through */
>       }
>  
>       case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

Shouldn't the /* fall through */ come after the } ?

Kind regards,
Wim.

Reply via email to