4.13-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

commit 890da9cf098364b11a7f7f5c22fa652531624d03 upstream.

This reverts commit 51204e0639c49ada02fd823782ad673b6326d748.

There wasn't really any good reason for it, and people are complaining
(rightly) that it broke existing practice.

Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c |   10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 #include <linux/timex.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
+#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
 
 /*
  *     Get CPU information for use by the procfs.
@@ -75,9 +76,14 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file
        if (c->microcode)
                seq_printf(m, "microcode\t: 0x%x\n", c->microcode);
 
-       if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC))
+       if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC)) {
+               unsigned int freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
+
+               if (!freq)
+                       freq = cpu_khz;
                seq_printf(m, "cpu MHz\t\t: %u.%03u\n",
-                          cpu_khz / 1000, (cpu_khz % 1000));
+                          freq / 1000, (freq % 1000));
+       }
 
        /* Cache size */
        if (c->x86_cache_size >= 0)


Reply via email to