4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> [ Upstream commit f451014692ae34e587b00de6745e16661cf734d8 ] If new_policy is set in cpufreq_online(), the policy object has just been created and its real_cpus mask has been zeroed on allocation, and the driver's ->init() callback should not touch it. It doesn't need to be cleared again, so don't do that. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1172,8 +1172,6 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int c if (new_policy) { /* related_cpus should at least include policy->cpus. */ cpumask_copy(policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus); - /* Clear mask of registered CPUs */ - cpumask_clear(policy->real_cpus); } /*
