Hi Rafael, On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > On Thursday, November 2, 2017 12:00:27 AM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> This series is a replacement for commit 0cc2b4e5a020 (PM / QoS: Fix device >> resume latency PM QoS) that had to be reverted due to problems introduced by >> it. >> >> This time the genpd PM QoS governor is first updated to be more consistent >> and the PM QoS changes are made on top of that which simplifies the second >> patch quite a bit. >> >> This is based on the linux-next branch from linux-pm.git as of now (should >> also apply to the current mainline just fine). >> >> Please test if you can or let me know if you have any comments. > > The v2 removes a couple of redundant checks from the first patch (and add > comments to explain why the checks are not needed) and fixes up the > "no constraint" value collision with a valid constraint multiplied by > NSEC_PER_USEC in the second patch. > > Please test if possible and let me know about any issues.
With this series, the 3 issues I reported before do not happen. Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+rene...@glider.be> Thank you. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds