On Sat, 04 Nov 2017 10:14:52 +0100
Nicolai Stange <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Luiz,
>
> [John Stultz added to CC]
>
> On Fri, Nov 03 2017, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>
> > [CC'ing lkml this time]
> >
> > I've observed that smp_apic_timer_interrupt() is sometimes called
> > two or more times a second on a nohz_full core which has a single
> > task taking 100% of the core. In one of the calls, hrtimer_interrupt()
> > runs tick_sched_timer(), but in others it doesn't call any handler.
> > Here's an example (Linus HEAD f34157878):
> >
> > <...>-1831 [008] 1060.115578: funcgraph_entry: |
> > smp_apic_timer_interrupt() {
> > <...>-1831 [008] 1060.115578: funcgraph_entry: |
> > hrtimer_interrupt() {
> > <...>-1831 [008] 1060.115578: hrtimer_expire_entry:
> > hrtimer=0xffff8edfefd12d60 function=tick_sched_timer now=1060079001980
> > <...>-1831 [008] 1060.115578: funcgraph_entry: 1.172 us |
> > tick_sched_timer();
> > <...>-1831 [008] 1060.115580: funcgraph_exit: 1.757 us | }
> > <...>-1831 [008] 1060.115580: hrtimer_start:
> > hrtimer=0xffff8edfefd12d60 function=tick_sched_timer expires=1061079000000
> > softexpires=1061079000000
> > <...>-1831 [008] 1060.115581: funcgraph_exit: 3.026 us | }
> > <...>-1831 [008] 1061.115577: funcgraph_entry: |
> > smp_apic_timer_interrupt() {
> > <...>-1831 [008] 1061.115577: funcgraph_entry: 0.261 us |
> > hrtimer_interrupt(); <---------- NO handler called
> > <...>-1831 [008] 1061.115578: funcgraph_exit: 1.349 us | }
> > <...>-1831 [008] 1061.115579: funcgraph_entry: |
> > smp_apic_timer_interrupt() {
> > <...>-1831 [008] 1061.115579: funcgraph_entry: |
> > hrtimer_interrupt() {
> > <...>-1831 [008] 1061.115579: hrtimer_expire_entry:
> > hrtimer=0xffff8edfefd12d60 function=tick_sched_timer now=1061079001473
> > <...>-1831 [008] 1061.115580: funcgraph_entry: 1.413 us |
> > tick_sched_timer();
> > <...>-1831 [008] 1061.115581: funcgraph_exit: 2.124 us | }
> > <...>-1831 [008] 1061.115582: hrtimer_start:
> > hrtimer=0xffff8edfefd12d60 function=tick_sched_timer expires=1062079000000
> > softexpires=1062079000000
> > <...>-1831 [008] 1061.115582: funcgraph_exit: 3.255 us | }
> >
> > Is this expected for some reason?
> >
> > I guess what's happening is that the deadline timer is firing
> > earlier than expected. From a few dozen to a few hundreds
> > nanoseconds earlier. When this happens, hrtimer_interrupt()
> > skips calling the hrtimer handler (since it's early) and the
> > apic is programmed to fire in the next microsecond.
>
> Exactly.
>
>
> > On further research I saw that Nicolai tried to fix a very similar
> > problem last year:
> >
> > commit 1a9e4c564ab174e53ed86def922804a5ddc63e7d
> > Author: Nicolai Stange <[email protected]>
> > Date: Thu Jul 14 17:22:54 2016 +0200
> >
> > x86/timers/apic: Fix imprecise timer interrupts by eliminating TSC
> > clockevents frequency roundoff error
> >
> > I noticed the following bug/misbehavior on certain Intel systems: with a
> > single task running on a NOHZ CPU on an Intel Haswell, I recognized
> > that I did not only get the one expected local_timer APIC interrupt, but
> > two per second at minimum. (!)
>
> Note that there's also 6731b0d611a1 ("x86/timers/apic: Inform TSC
> deadline clockevent device about recalibration").
>
>
> > Maybe this issue is still present?
>
> Yes it is. The reason is that NTP frequency adjustments would make it
> into the mono clocksource's frequency but not into the
> clock_event_device's.
>
> I sent a series back then [1] addressing this.
>
> However, in the meanwhile, I changed jobs and thus, got somehow
> distracted. My bad :/
>
> The result is that this got merged only up to what corresponds to
> [10/28] in [1].
>
> I'll pick this up again now and try to get the rest accepted for
> inclusion.
OK. If you get a new version, please include me in the CC so that
I can give it a try.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nicolai
>
>
> [1] last time I sent this series as a whole can be found at
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
>
