Oh, I hadn't noticed that. Then I amend my suggestion to be:
#ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_SMB_DIRECT
#define cifs_rdma_enabled(server) ((server)->rdma)
#else
#define cifs_rdma_enabled(server) 0
static inline void cifs_reconnect(struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
{
}
#endif
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Long Li
> Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2017 2:20 PM
> To: Long Li <lon...@microsoft.com>; Matthew Wilcox
> <mawil...@microsoft.com>; Pavel Shilovsky <piastr...@gmail.com>
> Cc: linux-cifs <linux-c...@vger.kernel.org>; Stephen Hemminger
> <sthem...@microsoft.com>; linux-r...@vger.kernel.org; Kernel Mailing List
> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Steve French <sfre...@samba.org>
> Subject: RE: [Patch v5 08/21] CIFS: SMBD: Upper layer reconnects to SMB
> Direct session
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: samba-technical [mailto:samba-technical-boun...@lists.samba.org]
> > On Behalf Of Long Li via samba-technical
> > Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2017 10:37 AM
> > To: Matthew Wilcox <mawil...@microsoft.com>; Pavel Shilovsky
> > <piastr...@gmail.com>
> > Cc: linux-cifs <linux-c...@vger.kernel.org>; Stephen Hemminger
> > <sthem...@microsoft.com>; linux-r...@vger.kernel.org; samba-technical
> > <samba-techni...@lists.samba.org>; Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> > ker...@vger.kernel.org>; Steve French <sfre...@samba.org>
> > Subject: RE: [Patch v5 08/21] CIFS: SMBD: Upper layer reconnects to SMB
> > Direct session
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Matthew Wilcox
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 12:45 PM
> > > To: Pavel Shilovsky <piastr...@gmail.com>; Long Li
> > > <lon...@microsoft.com>
> > > Cc: Steve French <sfre...@samba.org>; linux-cifs <linux-
> > > c...@vger.kernel.org>; samba-technical
> > > <samba-techni...@lists.samba.org>;
> > > Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; linux-
> > > r...@vger.kernel.org; Tom Talpey <ttal...@microsoft.com>; Stephen
> > > Hemminger <sthem...@microsoft.com>; Long Li <lon...@microsoft.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [Patch v5 08/21] CIFS: SMBD: Upper layer reconnects to
> > > SMB Direct session
> > >
> > > From: Pavel Shilovsky [mailto:piastr...@gmail.com]
> > > > 2017-10-18 16:09 GMT-07:00 Long Li <lon...@exchange.microsoft.com>:
> > > > > From: Long Li <lon...@microsoft.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Do a reconnect on SMB Direct when it is used as the connection.
> > > > > Reconnect
> > > > can
> > > > > happen for many reasons and it's mostly the decision of SMB2 upper
> > > layer.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Long Li <lon...@microsoft.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > fs/cifs/connect.c | 7 +++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c index
> > > > > 2c0b34a..8ca3c13 100644
> > > > > --- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
> > > > > +++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> > > > > @@ -406,7 +406,14 @@ cifs_reconnect(struct TCP_Server_Info
> > > > > *server)
> > > > >
> > > > > /* we should try only the port we connected to before
> > > > > */
> > > > > mutex_lock(&server->srv_mutex);
> > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_SMB_DIRECT
> > > > > + if (server->rdma)
> > > > > + rc = smbd_reconnect(server);
> > > > > + else
> > > > > + rc = generic_ip_connect(server);
> > > >
> > > > Minor: here and in other similar places we can remove #else part
> > > > below and put #endif before else block above.
> > > >
> > > > > +#else
> > > > > rc = generic_ip_connect(server);
> > > > > +#endif
> > >
> > > I'd suggest rather:
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_SMB_DIRECT
> > > #define cifs_rdma_enabled(server) ((server)->rdma)
> > > #else
> > > #define cifs_rdma_enabled(server) 0
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > Then we don't need an ifdef in the users, just:
> > >
> > > if (cifs_rdma_enabled(server))
> > > rc = smbd_reconnect(server);
> > > else
> > > rc = generic_ip_connect(server);
>
> It doesn't work well, because smbd_reconnect is defined when
> CONFIG_CIFS_SMB_DIRECT is set. Now the compiler is complaining it can't find
> this function. Maybe compiler is not smart enough :)
>
> I have sent v6 for all the other comments.
