3.16.50-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: David Miller <da...@davemloft.net>

commit c1f866767777d1c6abae0ec57effffcb72017c00 upstream.

More recent GCC warns about two kinds of switch statement uses:

1) Switching on an enumeration, but not having an explicit case
   statement for all members of the enumeration.  To show the
   compiler this is intentional, we simply add a default case
   with nothing more than a break statement.

2) Switching on a boolean value.  I think this warning is dumb
   but nevertheless you get it wholesale with -Wswitch.

This patch cures all such warnings in netfilter.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pa...@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_reject_ipv4.c | 2 ++
 net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_reject_ipv6.c | 2 ++
 net/netfilter/nft_compat.c           | 6 +++---
 net/netfilter/nft_ct.c               | 8 ++++++++
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_reject_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_reject_ipv4.c
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ void nft_reject_ipv4_eval(const struct n
        case NFT_REJECT_TCP_RST:
                nf_send_reset(pkt->skb, pkt->ops->hooknum);
                break;
+       default:
+               break;
        }
 
        data[NFT_REG_VERDICT].verdict = NF_DROP;
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_reject_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_reject_ipv6.c
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ void nft_reject_ipv6_eval(const struct n
        case NFT_REJECT_TCP_RST:
                nf_send_reset6(net, pkt->skb, pkt->ops->hooknum);
                break;
+       default:
+               break;
        }
 
        data[NFT_REG_VERDICT].verdict = NF_DROP;
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
@@ -295,11 +295,11 @@ static void nft_match_eval(const struct
                return;
        }
 
-       switch(ret) {
-       case true:
+       switch (ret ? 1 : 0) {
+       case 1:
                data[NFT_REG_VERDICT].verdict = NFT_CONTINUE;
                break;
-       case false:
+       case 0:
                data[NFT_REG_VERDICT].verdict = NFT_BREAK;
                break;
        }
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c
@@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ static void nft_ct_get_eval(const struct
                        state = NF_CT_STATE_BIT(ctinfo);
                dest->data[0] = state;
                return;
+       default:
+               break;
        }
 
        if (ct == NULL)
@@ -117,6 +119,8 @@ static void nft_ct_get_eval(const struct
                return;
        }
 #endif
+       default:
+               break;
        }
 
        tuple = &ct->tuplehash[priv->dir].tuple;
@@ -141,6 +145,8 @@ static void nft_ct_get_eval(const struct
        case NFT_CT_PROTO_DST:
                dest->data[0] = (__force __u16)tuple->dst.u.all;
                return;
+       default:
+               break;
        }
        return;
 err:
@@ -172,6 +178,8 @@ static void nft_ct_set_eval(const struct
                }
                break;
 #endif
+       default:
+               break;
        }
 }
 

Reply via email to