3.16.50-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>

commit ba0635ffb7665d76715b43ae8144e014a90c1e63 upstream.

Static checkers complain that we should probably add curly braces
because, from the indenting, it looks like seq_printf() should be inside
the list_for_each_entry() loop.  But the code is actually correct, it's
just the indenting which is off.

Besides fixing the indenting on seq_printf(), I did add curly braces,
because generally mult-line indents should have curly braces to make
them more readable.

The unintended indent was left behind and not unindented in

commit d7f46fc4e7323887494db13f063a8e59861fefb0
Author: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widaw...@intel.com>
Date:   Fri Dec 6 14:10:55 2013 -0800

    drm/i915: Make pin count per VMA
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -141,10 +141,11 @@ describe_obj(struct seq_file *m, struct
                   obj->madv == I915_MADV_DONTNEED ? " purgeable" : "");
        if (obj->base.name)
                seq_printf(m, " (name: %d)", obj->base.name);
-       list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma_list, vma_link)
+       list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma_list, vma_link) {
                if (vma->pin_count > 0)
                        pin_count++;
-               seq_printf(m, " (pinned x %d)", pin_count);
+       }
+       seq_printf(m, " (pinned x %d)", pin_count);
        if (obj->pin_display)
                seq_printf(m, " (display)");
        if (obj->fence_reg != I915_FENCE_REG_NONE)

Reply via email to