> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Williamson [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2017 4:37 AM
> To: Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]>
> Cc: Zhang, Tina <[email protected]>; Tian, Kevin <[email protected]>;
> Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> Lv, Zhiyuan <[email protected]>; [email protected]; intel-gvt-
> [email protected]; Wang, Zhi A <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 5/6] vfio: ABI for mdev display dma-buf operation
> 
> On Mon, 06 Nov 2017 10:05:34 +0100
> Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >   Hi,
> >
> > > > I thought we had agreed to make this behave similar to
> > > > VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD, the ioctl would take a __u32 dmabuf_id
> > > > and return the file descriptor as the ioctl return value.  Thanks,
> > >
> > > If we follow VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD, we would lose flags
> > > functionality.
> > > Zhi and Zhenyu, how do you think about it?
> >
> > The ioctl is simple enough that not having flags should not be a
> > problem I think.
> >
> > Also note that dmabuf_id is received using the PLANE_INFO ioctl, so
> > should the need arise to negotiate something in the future chances are
> > high that it can be done using the PLANE_INFO ioctl flags.
> 
> Right, the ioctl is "get fd for thing" so we have control of "thing".
> I think we had this same discussion on v15.  Thanks,
Then, OK. Thanks.

BR,
Tina
> 
> Alex

Reply via email to