On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 12:03:29PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >>[ 428.512005] e1000: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow
> >>Control: RX
> >>LKP: HOSTNAME vm-lkp-wsx03-openwrt-i386-8, MAC , kernel 4.14.0-rc8 158,
> >>serial console /dev/ttyS0
> >>[ 429.798345] Kernel tests: Boot OK!
> >>[ 430.761760] [ 430.766166] =====================================
> >>[ 430.775297] WARNING: bad unlock balance detected!
> >>[ 430.784342] 4.14.0-rc8 #158 Not tainted
> >>[ 430.792153] -------------------------------------
> >>[ 430.801319] pidof/1024 is trying to release lock (rcu_preempt_state) at:
> >>[ 430.813514] [<c10e4348>] rcu_read_unlock_special+0x5f8/0x620
> >>[ 430.824041] but there are no more locks to release!
> >
> >Er... yes? What of that? Since when is rcu_read_lock() not allowed to
> >be used under an rwsem?
That's not what it says, it is.. The warning is about trying to release
a lock that's not held. And its right, RCU was doing that. It would
acquire a lock without lockdep knowing about it and then telling lockdep
about freeing it.
This is fixed by commit:
02a7c234e540 ("rcu: Suppress lockdep false-positive ->boost_mtx complaints")
The problem is that RCU boosting was mixing futex and !futex rt_mutex
ops.
