On Sat, 5 May 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > NOTE: This patch is for conceptual review. I'd appreciate any feedback > > especially on the locking approach taken here. It will be critical to > > resolve the locking issue for this approach to become feasable. > > Do you have any numbers on how this improves dcache reclaim under memory > pressure?
How does one measure something like that? I wanted to first make sure that the thing is sane. If there is a gaping race here then I may have to add more code to cover that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
