It is not efficient to call gpiod_to_irq() regardless the flag, then
ignore the returned irq if MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL.

Move gpiod_to_irq() after the MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL check.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>
---

 drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c b/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c
index 863f1db..f7c6e05 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c
@@ -121,20 +121,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_gpio_request_ro);
 void mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq(struct mmc_host *host)
 {
        struct mmc_gpio *ctx = host->slot.handler_priv;
-       int ret, irq;
+       int irq = -EINVAL;
+       int ret;
 
        if (host->slot.cd_irq >= 0 || !ctx || !ctx->cd_gpio)
                return;
 
-       irq = gpiod_to_irq(ctx->cd_gpio);
-
        /*
-        * Even if gpiod_to_irq() returns a valid IRQ number, the platform might
-        * still prefer to poll, e.g., because that IRQ number is already used
-        * by another unit and cannot be shared.
+        * Do not use IRQ if the platform prefers to poll, e.g., because that
+        * IRQ number is already used by another unit and cannot be shared.
         */
-       if (irq >= 0 && host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL)
-               irq = -EINVAL;
+       if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL))
+               irq = gpiod_to_irq(ctx->cd_gpio);
 
        if (irq >= 0) {
                if (!ctx->cd_gpio_isr)
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to