d_move() will call __d_drop() and then __d_rehash()
on the dentry being moved.  This creates a small window
when the dentry appears to be unhashed.  Many tests
of d_unhashed() are made under ->d_lock and so are safe
from racing with this window, but some aren't.
In particular, getcwd() calls d_unlinked() (which calls
d_unhashed()) without d_lock protection, so it can race.

This races has been seen in practice with lustre, which uses d_move() as
part of name lookup.  See:
   https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-9735
It could race with a regular rename(), and result in ENOENT instead
of either the 'before' or 'after' name.

The race can be demonstrated with a simple program which
has two threads, one renaming a directory back and forth
while another calls getcwd() within that directory: it should never
fail, but does.  See:
  https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9455345/

We could fix this race by taking d_lock and rechecking when
d_unhashed() reports true.  Alternately when can remove the window,
which is the approach this patch takes.

When __d_drop and __d_rehash are used to move a dentry, an extra
flag is passed which causes d_hash.pprev to not be cleared, and
to not be tested.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.com>
---
 fs/dcache.c |   31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index d5952306206b..3130d62f29c9 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -471,8 +471,11 @@ static void dentry_lru_add(struct dentry *dentry)
  * reason (NFS timeouts or autofs deletes).
  *
  * __d_drop requires dentry->d_lock.
+ * ___d_drop takes an extra @moving argument.
+ * If true, d_hash.pprev is not cleared, so there is no transient d_unhashed()
+ * state.
  */
-void __d_drop(struct dentry *dentry)
+static void inline ___d_drop(struct dentry *dentry, bool moving)
 {
        if (!d_unhashed(dentry)) {
                struct hlist_bl_head *b;
@@ -493,12 +496,18 @@ void __d_drop(struct dentry *dentry)
                } else
                        hlist_bl_lock(b);
                __hlist_bl_del(&dentry->d_hash);
-               dentry->d_hash.pprev = NULL;
+               if (likely(!moving))
+                       dentry->d_hash.pprev = NULL;
                hlist_bl_unlock(b);
                /* After this call, in-progress rcu-walk path lookup will fail. 
*/
                write_seqcount_invalidate(&dentry->d_seq);
        }
 }
+
+void __d_drop(struct dentry *dentry)
+{
+       ___d_drop(dentry, false);
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__d_drop);
 
 void d_drop(struct dentry *dentry)
@@ -2387,10 +2396,10 @@ void d_delete(struct dentry * dentry)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_delete);
 
-static void __d_rehash(struct dentry *entry)
+static void __d_rehash(struct dentry *entry, bool moving)
 {
        struct hlist_bl_head *b = d_hash(entry->d_name.hash);
-       BUG_ON(!d_unhashed(entry));
+       BUG_ON(!moving && !d_unhashed(entry));
        hlist_bl_lock(b);
        hlist_bl_add_head_rcu(&entry->d_hash, b);
        hlist_bl_unlock(b);
@@ -2406,7 +2415,7 @@ static void __d_rehash(struct dentry *entry)
 void d_rehash(struct dentry * entry)
 {
        spin_lock(&entry->d_lock);
-       __d_rehash(entry);
+       __d_rehash(entry, false);
        spin_unlock(&entry->d_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_rehash);
@@ -2580,7 +2589,7 @@ static inline void __d_add(struct dentry *dentry, struct 
inode *inode)
                raw_write_seqcount_end(&dentry->d_seq);
                fsnotify_update_flags(dentry);
        }
-       __d_rehash(dentry);
+       __d_rehash(dentry, false);
        if (dir)
                end_dir_add(dir, n);
        spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
@@ -2642,7 +2651,7 @@ struct dentry *d_exact_alias(struct dentry *entry, struct 
inode *inode)
                        alias = NULL;
                } else {
                        __dget_dlock(alias);
-                       __d_rehash(alias);
+                       __d_rehash(alias, false);
                        spin_unlock(&alias->d_lock);
                }
                spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
@@ -2828,8 +2837,8 @@ static void __d_move(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry 
*target,
 
        /* unhash both */
        /* __d_drop does write_seqcount_barrier, but they're OK to nest. */
-       __d_drop(dentry);
-       __d_drop(target);
+       ___d_drop(dentry, true);
+       ___d_drop(target, exchange);
 
        /* Switch the names.. */
        if (exchange)
@@ -2838,9 +2847,9 @@ static void __d_move(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry 
*target,
                copy_name(dentry, target);
 
        /* rehash in new place(s) */
-       __d_rehash(dentry);
+       __d_rehash(dentry, true);
        if (exchange)
-               __d_rehash(target);
+               __d_rehash(target, true);
 
        /* ... and switch them in the tree */
        if (IS_ROOT(dentry)) {


Reply via email to