On 10/11/2017 at 09:59, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Calculating yday in the read_alarm callback is useless as this value is
> never used later. Also, it was buggy anyway because at the time this is
> done, tm_year is always 0 as the alarm register doesn't hold the year.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com>

Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.fe...@microchip.com>

> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c
> index e221b78b6f10..e84f5ec4faf6 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,6 @@ static int at91_rtc_readalarm(struct device *dev, struct 
> rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
>       struct rtc_time *tm = &alrm->time;
>  
>       at91_rtc_decodetime(AT91_RTC_TIMALR, AT91_RTC_CALALR, tm);
> -     tm->tm_yday = rtc_year_days(tm->tm_mday, tm->tm_mon, tm->tm_year);
>       tm->tm_year = at91_alarm_year - 1900;
>  
>       alrm->enabled = (at91_rtc_read_imr() & AT91_RTC_ALARM)
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre

Reply via email to