* Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com> [171110 06:43]: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:23:40PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> [171109 22:19]: > > > * Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> [171110 03:28]: > > > > Then I'll follow up on cleaning up save_secure_ram_context later. > > > > > > Here's a better version, the static mapping did not get used.. It > > > just moved the area so it happened to work. It needs to be set > > > up as MT_MEMORY_RWX_NONCACHED instead. > > > > I see a better version now. Hmm... I guess that it also has the > problem that I mentioned on first version. > > > And FYI, here's what I currently have for the follow-up patch, > > but that can wait a bit. > > Okay. So, this patch should be applied on the top of above better version?
Yeah, but we may actually want to combine both patches into a single patch to avoid the save_secure_ram_context 0xffff translation limit, see my comments in the first version. Regards, Tony
