This while loop has an overly complex condition, which performs a
couple of assignments.  This hurts readability.

We don't really need a loop at all.  We can just return -EAGAIN and
(providing we set SK_DATA), the function will be called again.

So discard the loop, make the complex conditional become a few clear
function calls, and hopefully improve readability.


Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

### Diffstat output
 ./net/sunrpc/svcsock.c |   21 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff .prev/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c ./net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
--- .prev/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c  2007-05-07 10:30:16.000000000 +1000
+++ ./net/sunrpc/svcsock.c      2007-05-07 10:31:04.000000000 +1000
@@ -788,15 +788,20 @@ svc_udp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
        }
 
        clear_bit(SK_DATA, &svsk->sk_flags);
-       while ((err = kernel_recvmsg(svsk->sk_sock, &msg, NULL,
-                                    0, 0, MSG_PEEK | MSG_DONTWAIT)) < 0 ||
-              (skb = skb_recv_datagram(svsk->sk_sk, 0, 1, &err)) == NULL) {
-               if (err == -EAGAIN) {
-                       svc_sock_received(svsk);
-                       return err;
+       skb = NULL;
+       err = kernel_recvmsg(svsk->sk_sock, &msg, NULL,
+                            0, 0, MSG_PEEK | MSG_DONTWAIT);
+       if (err >= 0)
+               skb = skb_recv_datagram(svsk->sk_sk, 0, 1, &err);
+
+       if (skb == NULL) {
+               if (err != -EAGAIN) {
+                       /* possibly an icmp error */
+                       dprintk("svc: recvfrom returned error %d\n", -err);
+                       set_bit(SK_DATA, &svsk->sk_flags);
                }
-               /* possibly an icmp error */
-               dprintk("svc: recvfrom returned error %d\n", -err);
+               svc_sock_received(svsk);
+               return -EAGAIN;
        }
        rqstp->rq_addrlen = sizeof(rqstp->rq_addr);
        if (skb->tstamp.tv64 == 0) {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to