On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:

> > > > -#define SECURITY_NAME_MAX      10
> > > > +#define SECURITY_NAME_MAX      15
> > > 
> > > Should this small hunk be a separate atomic patch?
> > 
> > I thought about it, but this is the first and only LSM with a larger
> > name.
> 
> Maybe the commit log should mention that then.

Actually, make it a separate patch, so we can easily pinpoint the commit.

-- 
James Morris
<[email protected]>

Reply via email to