On 05/07, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> I guess pseudo code below is not that strange, but real usecase:
> 
> probe()
> {
>       INIT_DELAYED_WORK(...);
>       /* we're not issuing queue_delayed_work() in probe(), work will
>        * be started by interrupt */
>       return;
> }
> 
> remove()
> {
>       /* hang will happen here if there was no queue_delyed_work()
>        * call (like there was no interrupts, which starts rearming
>        * work */
>       cancel_rearming_delayed_work();
> }
> 
> 
> Your patch will fix it, right?

Yes, the new implemantation should work correctly.

However, this particular case was already fixed earlier,

        
workqueue-make-cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue-work-on-idle-dwork.patch
        http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits&m=117081275901499

Note that INIT_DELAYED_WORK() sets work->data = 0, and
cancel_rearming_delayed_work() does "Was it ever queued"
check.

Still, before this patch, cancel_rearming_delayed_work() hangs
if this work was used before, but not active + re-arming now.

Oleg.   

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to