Hi, On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:58:15PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sat, 05 May 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > + printk(KERN_WARNING "HPET counter is defect\n"); > > What about > printk(KERN_WARNING "HPET counter is stopped\n"); > > which is far more descriptive?
Far more misguiding, rather? People may mistake this (when not realizing the KERN_WARNING output) as a status message indicating that we actively stopped the counter. Maybe something like "HPET counter inoperable or defective (no increment found during probing)"? (with an optional "please report" part) Andreas Mohr - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/