On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 03:46:10PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 13:55 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > > know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: Harninder Rai <harninder....@nxp.com> > > > > > > [ Upstream commit 73447f68d7b2bc1df870da88b0e21d2bc1afc025 ] > > > > Signed-off-by: Harninder Rai <harninder....@nxp.com> > > Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Upadhaya <bhaskar.upadh...@nxp.com> > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn...@kernel.org> > > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@verizon.com> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qoriq-clock.txt | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qoriq-clock.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qoriq-clock.txt > > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ Required properties: > > * "fsl,t4240-clockgen" > > * "fsl,b4420-clockgen" > > * "fsl,b4860-clockgen" > > + * "fsl,ls1012a-clockgen" > > This isn't supported or used anywhere in 4.4, so it makes sense to > document it.
It "does" or "does not" make sense? Should I drop this patch? confused, greg k-h