On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:32:21PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 04:05:17PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> > >+static const struct sdw_device_id *
> > >+sdw_get_device_id(struct sdw_slave *slave, struct sdw_driver *drv)
> > Indentation looks Odd here,
> not really, the return type in preceding line is a perfect way to define
> things...
Yeah, that's fairly normal - just ugly long. You could also do it by
splitting the arguments over two lines.
> > >+ ret = dev_pm_domain_attach(dev, false);
> > >+ if (ret) {
> > I think we discussed this in v1, but erring out here means that all the
> > devices need to have pm domain attached, which might not be true all the
> > time.
> oh yes, sorry i missed this one. will fix
Looking at this pattern here I'm wondering if this should be folded into
the domain code, everything attaching a domain is going to need to take
care of this at the minute.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
