On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote: Sorry, I was too stupid to fixup Kate's e-mail address after Joe pointed it out. My apologies. Please remove 'k...@linuxfoundation.org' from the CC list and replace it with 'kstew...@linuxfoundation.org'
/me goes off to rumage for brown paperbags > This is the second version of the licensing rules documentation. > > Changes since v1 [1]: > > - Addressing the review comments from Jon, Joe and Jonas: > > - Moved the documentation file into Documentation/process, but kept the > topic entry in the top level index file so it stands out. (Joe) > > - Changed the license file metatags so they are not overloading > SPDX-License-Identifier (Jonas) > > - Cleaned up the inconsistencies in the document (Jon, Joe) > > - Added the comment style fior .rst files (Jon) > > - Added a few more links and cursed restructured text to make it render > halfways sensible. > > - Added the license files for the SPDX tags which are already in tree and > moved GPL-1.0 to the 'other' directory as it really does not belong into > the preferrred category. > > - Removed the Reviewed-by tags as they not longer apply. > > Please go over it with a fine comb again. I'm sure that I screwed up > something on the way, but me staring more at it doesn't help. > > Thanks to everyone who provided input! > > It turned out that the original approach was incidentaly close to what the > FSFE REUSE initiative docuemented and I think we are now nearing the point > where we can wear the REUSE sticker if Jonas does not find any other holes > in it. :) > > Thanks, > > tglx > > > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171112191821.240484...@linutronix.de > > >
